![]()
The Official Glasair Support Site
Experimental Aircraft FAQ |
Q301: What is the Experimental category,
and what types of aircraft are classified/operated in that category?
Q302: What is a kit airplane versus a plans-built airplane?
Q303: What separates a homebuilt from an ultralight?
Q304: Why would someone want to build and fly a homebuilt when
perfectly good certified aircraft are available?
Q305: What is the 51% rule, and how does it affect me?
Q306: What are some common experimental types, kit-built or not?
Q307: What are the tradeoffs of metal vs wood vs composites?
Q308: What types of engines can I use?
Q309: Why do pilots get so upset over the choices between two and four
stroke engines?
Q310: Can I use non-certified props?
Q311: How do I license my completed airplane, and what inspections are
needed?
Q312: How are registration numbers assigned, and can I choose one?
Q313: Can I type-certify my airplane?
Q314: If I sell the airplane, am I liable for it later?
Q315: What operations are illegal in my homebuilt that might not be in
a type-certified airplane?
Q316: What happens if I buy a homebuilt that I didn't build?
Q317: Can I insure a homebuilt airplane?
Q318: Am I safe flying a homebuilt airplane?
Q319: What health hazards might be involved while building?
Q320: What design should I choose?
Q321: Where can I see one of my choices, and can I fly one?
Q322: How long will it take to finish?
Q323: How do I know if I can afford it?
Q324: What tools and facilities will I need?
Q325: Will my marriage survive?
Q326: How do my maintenance costs compare to a certified airplane?
Q327: Who is the EAA, and what do they offer me? How can I join, and are there any local
builder clubs?
Q328: Where can I find parts or materials for my project?
Q329: Can I find more written info?
Q330: Are there any BBS'es where I can get more info?
Q331: Is there anyone on Usenet who knows about the GarageRocket 432?
Q332: I'm having trouble with construction, where can I get help?
Q333: What financing is available for building a plane?
Q334: Can I take lessons/get my license in my homebuilt?
Q301: What is the Experimental category, and what
types of aircraft are classified/operated in that category?
A The Experimental category is essentially an "operating classification" that
has a legal bearing on the operation of the aircraft, just like Normal, Utility, or
Aerobatic categories have. There are several sub-classifications in the category,
such as Amateur-built, Racing, Exhibition, Limited, R & D, and others.
Experimental/amateur-built aircraft refer to non-type-certified aircraft that are built,
maintained, and flown by individuals, thus the term "homebuilt". Amateur-built
aircraft are intended by the FAA to serve as educational "vehicles" for their
builders and pilots.
The original justification for making the category legal was that it increased the pool of
individuals knowledgeable in the area of aircraft production. Thus the nation had
"experts" in aircraft production to draw upon in times of national emergency.
Silly as this may sound today, it was taken seriously in the mid '50s when the category
addition was being proposed.
Note that a type-certified airplane may also be re-categorized as experimental if it's
modified in a form such that the FAA will not approve on a standard 337. This is often the
case for prototype/modified certified aircraft, or for highly specialized
applications (although these are often categorized as "Restricted" too).
Q302: What is a kit airplane versus a plans-built
airplane?
A: Kit airplanes are aircraft designs that are sold as a package of
parts and subassemblies to be assembled by the owner. They are primarily a market response
to the lack of new and affordable type-certified production aircraft. The kit attempts to
strike a balance between those desiring a finished airplane, versus those wanting to
build. They also allow people to build a new aircraft when they may not possess the
time or ability to build from scratch. Cost of a kit airplane is generally higher
than that of plans-built.
The "plans-built" aircraft is scratch built from a set of engineering drawings
only, the builder makes most all of the parts
from raw materials. This was the "original" form of homebuilding. These take
longer to complete than a kit airplane, but can also be less expensive and more rewarding
to those who enjoy building. For the popular designs, quite a few prefab parts do
exist, especially the ones that are too difficult or costly to fabricate yourself.
The term "kitplane" is commonly used for kit aircraft, but the term itself is
trademarked by KITPLANES magazine.
Q303: What separates a homebuilt from an
ultralight?
A: Ultralights and Experimentals may both be built by the owner, but the
ultralight may carry no passengers (except for instruction). It also has limits on
weight, speed, and fuel, which the homebuilt has none of (outside of operating
restrictions in part 91).
Often, licensed ultralight owners have chosen to obtain airworthiness certificates so that
they can overcome one or more of these restrictions. This reclassifies the ultralight as
an experimental, and the pilot certificate, medical, and currency requirements become
effective.
Q304: Why would someone want to build and fly a
homebuilt when perfectly good certified aircraft are available?
A: In a sense, Cessnas & Pipers can be compared to older Chevys and Fords, in that
they attempt to be "all things to all people". Such compromises may be
acceptable for most, but not all pilots.
One of the remarkable things about homebuilts is the sheer diversity of designs &
intended purposes. There are some compact aircraft that store in your garage and fly off
of any short field. Right next to it might be another that carries 4 people 300mph at
18,000 ft. Next to that one is one that cost less that $10K to build. Another could be
flown in unlimited-class aerobatics.
Note that your garden variety Skyhawk can't do any of these things, but it's still a quite
a useful & desirable airplane. It all
depends on what you want it to do.
Q305: What is the 51% rule, and how does it
affect me?
A: In order for an aircraft to qualify as amateur-built, at least half the work must
be done by the builder, less than half may be performed by a kit supplier or other outside
sources.
The genesis of this rule surrounded the original Christen Eagle kit. An FAA official
insisted that Frank Christenson's biplane kit was too complete, that the builder didn't
need to do enough work. Frank went to some length to prove to the FAA that this
wasn't true.
Now the FAA maintains a list of "approved" kits that have been proven to comply
with the 51% rule. Note that a kit does *not* need to be on the list to be legally sold,
it just serves as proof to the FAA that the type complies with the rule. Some kit
suppliers opt not to put their products on the list, the reason being that once approved,
any changes to the product require reapproval by the FAA. If your kit is not on the
list, you will have to prove 51% compliance at inspection time.
The inspector does his job based on a set of guidelines published in the "inspectors
handbook" issued by the FAA to their field inspectors. The guidelines for the 51%
rule are established in this handbook. All decisions made by the inspector are
effectively determinations "by the Administrator" (if you're familiar with the
FARs, you'll understand the phrase immediately.
The "51% approved" list is available from the FAA's experimental safety
BBS in Oke City, see the number listed. Compliance decisions that determine listed
kits are made by an engineering group internal to the FAA.
Q306: What are some common experimental types,
kit-built or not?
A: Glasair, Kitfox, Velocity, Cozy, EZ, Van's RV series, Europa...
Q307: What are the tradeoffs of metal vs wood vs
composites?
A: This can be a heated subject amongst builders, we'll try to approach the subject
generally and gracefully.
Metal construction has the widest acceptance by the non-aviating public. It is relatively
simple to work with, and is inexpensive. A metal structure is strong and of moderate
weight and cost. But with improper care it corrodes, and recent events (like the Hawaiian
737 that lost it's top) have reminded us that metal does have a finite fatigue life.
Wood is the oldest aircraft structural material, but has a poor public acceptance. The
strength-to-weight ratio and fatigue
resistance of wood is excellent, the problem is simply its susceptability to rot. Properly
protected and stored, a wooden
airframe will last decades. But if not cared for, it will be destroyed in a few short
years. Wood also tends to be expensive,
and the supply is erratic.
Composites, "compost" jokes aside, have received much attention recently
from private and commercial builders alike, largely due to work done a few years ago
by Burt Rutan. Composite aircraft can be quite strong structurally, and be
built at very reasonable costs. The airplanes have very low drag figures and
beautiful finishes. It is easy to work with. But there are concerns about longevity
of the material. Most resins create an airframe that must be painted white to
prevent excessive heat buildup in the sunshine, since epoxies and vinylesters soften
significantly with an increase in
temperature.
All methods are perfectly viable. Which one you choose all depends on your preferences,
abilities, and your needs for the airplane.
Q308: What types of engines can I use?
A: Literally any! For years, homebuilders have relied on certified engines. But as the
cost of these engines rises, alternatives have been found. Several companies are building
specialty engines specifically for experimental use, and others are hard at work adapting
automotive engines.
The Rotax engines have received lots of attention. There are both two and four stroke
geared engines for experimental use and most are water cooled. All are fairly reasonable
in cost compared to their certified counterparts. These products develop power in the 40
to 100hp category.
Some builder are enthusiastic about auto conversions, some are not. Early on, a few
builders were pulling engines out of junked autos with poor results. Untuned engines were
not ready for such high-manifold pressure operations and suffered burnt plugs, blown
pistons, etc. But other builders have taken the time to customize and tune auto engines to
the application, and the results are improving. The all-aluminum small-block Chevrolet is
becoming the poor-mans "Mini Merlin" and produces excellent power (not to
mention sound!). Some are also experimenting with Wankel-type rotaries, as their
power-to-weight ratio and physical compactness make them excellent candidates for aircraft
use. Power in auto conversions can run from 80 to 400+ hp.
Water-cooled engines aside, builders have used air-cooled Volkswagen conversions for
years, and several companies are now producing parts and completed engines. One company
(Mosler Engines) actually has one of their VW Type IV engines certified in
Australia. VW engines sound similar to their Lycoming or Continental counterparts but rev
higher, in the 3100rpm range. Modified stock crankshafts seem to show a tendency to
break, but the custom cranks do better (and cost more). Parts are usually reasonable
(but notice I didn't say "cheap").
If you are looking for an IFR cruiser to carry passengers, it may be best to stick with
certified engines and swallow the cost. But if your purpose is a VFR weekend toy
with good forced-landing options and you like to tinker with motors, you might consider a
conversion. Again, your choice really depends on the mission.
A word of warning: When choosing a certified engine, the engine must be equipped and
maintained as it normally would be for a certified aircraft. This means that all AD and
bulletins must be complied with. This can have some impact on your flight test
period. If you make any mods to such an engine, it will be considered a
non-certified engine for all intents and purposes by the FAA, which will increase
the test period from 25 to 40 hours. It will also reduce the market value of an
otherwise expensive engine.
Q309: Why do pilots get so upset over the choices
between two and four stroke engines?
A: The four-stroke air-cooled engine has been the mainstay of light aviation for over 50
years and this shows no immediate signs of change. Yet some two-stroke designs have
attracted strong followings in recent years. Why has this happened?
The two most obvious factors are probably cost and weight. A 65hp Rotax costs and weighs
roughly 60% of its certified Continental A-65 counterpart. For the newer generation of
"portable" lightplanes, this reduced weight is an obvious design advantage.
The owners of these types often have to be conservative with their flying
dollars as well, so the Rotax wins over many of them. When they consider that it can
be majored by the owner in his garage for a few hundred dollars in an afternoon, the
decision is easily made.
Yet there are pilots out there who think of the idea of a "chainsaw" engine as
anathema to a proper aircraft. Improper
mixture control in a two-stroke can damage the engine quickly. The vibration through the
airframe is of a higher pitch. The higher operating speed of the engine requires a geared
speed reduction system. Probably the worst offense: the sound of two-stroke aircraft is
simply unpleasant to some eardrums.
The reliability questions of two-strokes may have some basis. Then again, it is often
found that problems resulted from improper installation, operation, or maintenance.
Possibly there is truth here, since the $10,000 certified engine understandably gets
"fussed" over considerably more. Its care and feeding are well understood by
most pilots since we are usually trained behind such engines anyway.
Should you choose a two-stroke? Again, it all depends on your preferences and
requirements. If you need more than 65hp, your decision is essentially made for now. But
if it's a consideration for you, study your options and carefully evaluate your needs.
Ride behind both and see if you're comfortable with them.
Q310: Can I use non-certified props?
A: Absolutely. You can use certified, original, or modified props.
Q311: How do I license my completed airplane, and
what inspections are needed?
A: You *did* document the construction, didn't you?
Before you are issued an airworthiness certificate, an FAA inspector will require an
inspection of the aircraft and all
documentation of its construction. They used to require a "pre-cover inspection of
the internal structure, but no longer.
Now they prefer that in-progress inspections are done by an EAA Technical Counselor,
and the inspector will look for his/her comments in the construction log. When the FAA
inspector arrives, they expect the aircraft to be ready for inspection (all covers
removed), all taxi tests done and logged, and all documentation ready for review.
When the inspector is satisfied that your airplane is ready for inflight testing, they
will issue a restricted airworthiness
certificate that describes a test period and testing requirements (or they may insist on
changes or repairs if deficiencies are
noted). The testing period is usually 40 flying hours (often 25 if you use a certified
engine & prop), and limits you to a fixed
testing area, normally a 25 mile radius from the home airport and over unpopulated areas.
Passengers are not allowed during the testing period. While testing, keep a *detailed* log
of all activities, repairs, and changes.
The inspector will evaluate your testing at the end of the test period, at which point he
or she will issue a permanent
airworthiness certificate. At that point, you are free to carry passengers and fly
most anywhere you like.
If any major modifications or repairs are done later, the airplane may need a
re-inspection and retest. Call your local FSDO before doing this to find out what they
want to see.
You can also be issued a Repairmans Certificate for your airplane only (*not* the type in
general). This allows you to perform all repairs, inspections, annuals, etc. on the
airframe, since they figure if you built it, you should be able to fix it. Note that in
FAR part 45, an "annual" is referred to as a "condition check", which
is legally different from an "annual inspection", even if both actions are
intended to accomplish the same goal.
Please note that the above information is valid only in the USA, other countries usually
have very similar requirements, with some slight differences. Check with your local
authorities before committing any large sums of money or time to a project.
Also note that this procedure is the general case. It is entirely possible that you may
experience variations in the procedure. For instance, one netter commented that his
inspector waived the second inspection and allowed standard experimental privileges
immediately after the test time was flown off and logged. As FAA policy often varies
between regions, expect some slight exceptions.
Q312: How are registration numbers assigned, and
can I choose one?
A: N numbers in the US are assigned by the FAA Aircraft Registry in
Oklahoma City. You must get one assigned before you have your finished airplane inspected.
It's sometimes suggested that you wait until about 6 months before estimated completion,
since they will charge you an annual fee for reserving a number.
Requesting an assigned number will cost $5. If you want to request a special number, it
costs $10. If you request one, they suggest you submit a list of choices, like 5 or so in
order of your preference.
Q313: Can I type-certify my airplane?
A: Not recommended. The costs are extremely prohibitive (which is often
why the designers refuse to do it), and there is little benefit. Remember that the only
major restriction on experimental operations is use of the aircraft for hire.
Q314: If I sell the airplane, am I liable for it
later?
A: Unfortunately, there is potential for a liability problem. Even
though "free" legal advice is often available on the net, I advise you to
contact your attorney if you find this issue troubling.
Some advocate having the buyer sign a "release form", which would be
promise not to sue if anything goes wrong. These are essentially worthless... the
buyer can't sign over his or her *spouse's* rights, nor those of any one he or she sells
the airplane to.
Q315: What operations are illegal in my homebuilt
that might not be in a type-certified airplane?
A: Operations for hire are *expressly* forbidden - no paid cargo or
passengers are permitted. Also, flight over densely populated areas is also against the
regs, but this does not seem to be enforced strongly unless the "reckless
operation" clause in part 91 is
called into play.
This is not as restrictive as you might think. Often clubs are formed around homebuilt
aircraft, and it is legal for you to pay an instructor to give you a checkout or BFR in
your airplane.
So in general, you can do most anything with your homebuilt that you can do with normal
private pilot privileges.
Q316: What happens if I buy a homebuilt that I
didn't build?
A: You get poor, like all airplane owners :) Anyway, you will not be
able to obtain a repairman certificate, since you didn't build the airplane. The
airplane can be inspected and maintained by an A&P... an Inspection Authorization is
not required. Also, if the original owner retains his or her Repairman
Certificate, they can continue working on your plane...that is, if you can talk them into
it.
There is a "gentleman's agreement" between the FAA and EAA that allows the owner
of a homebuilt to perform maintenance on the aircraft, as long as an A&P signs off the
work within a year. In other words, the A&P's annual inspection not only covers
the inspection of the airplane, but it counts as the yearly signoff for work done by the
owner in the past year. An EAA article on
this agreement can be found at http://www.halcyon.com/wanttaja/maint.html
Parts for kit airplanes may or may not be available depending on the source. For either
kit or plans-built, one thing to insist upon is having the plans in your possession or
available. This way should a part need to be fabricated later, you still have the specs to
do it by.
Q317: Can I insure a homebuilt airplane?
A: Yes you can. The insurance company may have their own requirements
above the FARs, but they normally will insure one. You may find lower limits on passenger
liability coverage though.
However, there is a growing problem with higher performance kit airplanes such as the
Glasair III, Lancair IV, 320, and 235. Asignificant number of pilots have bought into
these designs since they offer performance levels in excess of that available from
Wichita. In an unfortunate few cases there has been poor construction, and little to no
training in aircraft that fly far ahead of the average 172 or Cherokee pilot.
One example of changes: Where fast kit airplanes are concerned, a major aviation insurance
company is insisting on periodic construction inspections by company reps, and thorough
checkouts in type (+10hrs) before they will underwrite a policy for that aircraft. Check
this out before you make a commitment.
Q318: Am I safe flying a homebuilt airplane?
A: You are as safe as you want to be. Little definitive data exists
comparing homebuilts to certified aircraft. One set of opinions holds that accident rates
are about the same for both certified and homebuilt aircraft, once the test period for the
homebuilt is complete. Certified aircraft seem to have more unintentional IMC accidents,
while homebuilts fare worse in accidents resulting from over-stress from aerobatics,
forced landings, etc.
Safety is still a function of the pilots ability to make intelligent decisions, as with
all aviation.
Q319: What health hazards might be involved while
building?
A: The most obvious hazards are those involved with common shop
practices, such as wearing protective lenses, handling
power tools
properly, etc. Follow common sense in shop practice, and
you should
be just as safe as if you were building household
furniture.
However, a more subtle danger exists where chemicals are
concerned.
Composite structures require handling of chemical resins
that are
more exotic that simple adhesives. Paint systems also
require extra
care. Epoxies and Polyurethane finishes pose the worst
problem.
Epoxies emit fumes that, while annoying, seem generally
harmless
at first. But after exposure, your body builds an allergic
reaction
to the substance. Once that threshold has been crossed, you
will
be "sensitized" for the rest of your life. The
isocyanate content
of polyurethane paint can trigger severe respiratory spasms
once
you become sensitized to them. Again, the reaction
potential never
goes away. Some paint and primer products also have
carcinogenic
potentials as well.
The solution is skin and respiratory protection, and good
ventilation of the shop. *All* paints require at least
filter
respiration, isocyanate based paints require a fresh-air
system as
well. Wear protective gloves and eyewear. Above all, put an
exhaust fan in your shop and use it, so as not to affect
the whole
household.
Before you open an unfamiliar substance, read *all* the
supplier's
warnings about protection. If you don't understand them,
the
supplier should be happy to explain the requirements.
Whatever you
do, *please* don't ignore those precautions.
You may invest years and thousands of dollars in your
airplane.
Make sure you're still healthy enough to fly it when the
time
comes.
----------------------------------
Subject: Choosing a project
Q320: What design should I choose?
A: It's all up to the individual, but I'd highly suggest that you pay
particular attention to the following 2 items:
(1) Your desired mission for your airplane.
(2) Your available resources (money, space, ability, etc.)
Once you've a realistic and unemotional (!) handle on these
items,
start checking out designs until you find 2 or 3 designs
that fit
your situation best. Then go ahead and start checking out
differences between them. Don't dwell too much on factors
like
"I've never done any welding" since you're going to
have to learn
to do lots of things you never considered before. Also,
designers'
claims for performance are often "stretched" a
bit, so wait to
talk to owners before making any final decisions.
When you're at this point, it's time to start checking out
real
aircraft. This is where the fun begins....
----------------------------------
Subject: Evaluating types
Q321: Where can I see one of my choices, and can I fly one?
A: Oshkosh is great place to see virtually everything side-by-side,
but it's not the best place to take a ride because of
traffic. If
you do go to OSH, there will be builders' forums, dinners,
and
parties for type-specific gatherings. Make sure you take
advantage
of these. Same thing goes for Sun'n'Fun if you can make
that
instead.
Smaller fly-ins may be better for taking a ride *if* your
favorite
type shows up. If your pet design is a little more obscure,
it may
take some effort.
Once you've expressed interest in a type (usually by buying
the
$10-$20 "info pack"), the seller may provide you
with the addresses
& phones of customers who are willing to demo. This is
not as
unusual as one might think - builders often love to show
off their
toys! But if the design is a single seater, forget the
ride.
For most popular kit airplanes, the companies usually keep
a
demonstrator around. You will probably have to go to them
unless
they are "touring" your area giving demos.
Some people do actually build and fly aircraft without ever
having
seen or ridden in one. But if there's a way to avoid that,
do!
----------------------------------
Subject: Completion time
Q322: How long will it take to finish?
A: Always longer than you think! A well-known writer in homebuilt
topics is often quoted as saying "Firewall-forward is
half the
work", and "The jobs you thought were simple take
forever, and the
jobs you thought were tough turn out to be easy".
Designers often try to minimize their estimates of
completion time
for obvious reasons. And time varies significantly with
builder
skill and experience. So the best way to estimate this is
to talk
to other builders who have finished their projects.
For simple fixed-gear kits, 500-1500 hours seems common.
For
complex kit airplanes (such as retractables) 1500-3000 is
more
realistic. For plans-built airplanes, anywhere from
1000-8000+
hours are involved. All of these numbers are highly
dependent on
the type, and on builder skills.
Don't be too dependant on "goal fixation", take
the time to do the
job right. Above all, don't push it to try and get finished
for a
major fly-in. The risks aren't worth it. Besides, the
better
attention you pay to small details will make you feel all
that
much better when you do fly it to a big event.
----------------------------------
Subject: Completion cost
Q323: How do I know if I can afford it?
A: Well, if you have to ask....
The "nickel & dime" costs in construction can
really add up fast.
Generally, if the cost of a kit is already a real stretch,
you have
a problem. Sometimes the finished cost of a kit airplane
will exceed
twice the cost of the kit itself.
Plan for this. Add up all the costs you can think of, then
add 20%
for the stuff you *didn't* know about. Plan for
contingencies: if
you make a mistake covering a wing, you may have to redo it
(the
price of learning how). Be realistic with your estimations.
Scratch building is a little easier in that your
expectations have
to be lowered. You expect a certain monthly amount to be
spent
towards supplies, so you simply buy what you can afford,
and hope
that it stays ahead of your building speed. You know that
you're
trading time for money, and since completion is so far away
it
doesn't seem so obvious.
Again, talk to other builders, and be honest with yourself
about
what you can afford. An awful lot of projects never get
finished
because the money supply ran out.
----------------------------------
Subject: Builder requirements
Q324: What tools and facilities will I need?
A: Many designers will specify the tools needed for construction in
their particular case. Again (sorry!) other builders are
also a
good source.
Every builder will need a set of basic mechanics tools.
Nothing
fancy, but cheap tools often cost you money and time too.
Another
shop accessory almost everyone needs is a small portable
(or big :)
air compressor. For painting, to cleaning parts, to driving
rivets,
to general shop cleanup, compressed air is a welcome asset.
A small
variable speed power drill is another virtual necessity.
A small grinder and a drill press are other useful items.
For wood,
a small table saw and bandsaw are indispensable. An orbital
sander
is needed for wood and composite finishing. Wood builders
simply
*never* have enough clamps, or so it seems. There are many,
many
other items which are often nice, but not necessarily
mandatory.
Builders often get quite carried away with tools, and its
true that
they can make a job easier and faster. But if you're in a
squeeze
for a particularly expensive tool, think about how often
you will
use it. It's entirely possible that you're better off
renting one,
or borrowing one from a friend.
It's often amazing to hear of the places airplanes have
been
created. One grand-champion airplane from the '92 season
was built
on the owners back patio! But the favorite shop by far is
the
ubiquitous suburban garage. Most airplanes can have the
majority
of the work done on components in the garage, usually
moving to
the hangar at the final assembly stage.
Whatever space you use, make sure it's well lighted and
ventilated.
Composite aircraft may require winter heat in order for
resins to
cure properly. Above all, make sure you can get the
assembly *out*
of the shop before you start. More than one builder has had
to
"modify" his basement to extract a completed
wing....
----------------------------------
Subject: Marital discord
Q325: Will my marriage survive?
A: This is too often the sad joke on the prop-tags at fly-ins:
"Cost:
$64000 plus Linda" or "Brenda's Nightmare"
placarded on the panel.
We've also heard of cases where a choice had to be made
between the
lover and the airplane, and the plane won. Such is the
magnet of
aviation....
Discuss this at length with your significant other. Explain
the
commitment and be truthful. If they fly, great! But if not,
seriously weigh the situation and enter with his or her
blessing.
Talk it over well with the kids too, if you have them. Some
of them
thrill at the idea of building "our very own
plane". Others will
think you've lost your mind. Kids can be great helpers too.
What
better way to prove to them the practical value of
education?
Consider establishing a planned work schedule. This does
two
things, it lets the family know when you will be available,
and
it helps keep your work habits consistent (keeping you on
track
to finish it).
Once started, don't forget dinners out, long walks, helping
the
kids with homework, and bathing the dog. They all need you
too.
Have the number of the nearest florist on the shop wall,
just in
case.
Then again, sometimes sanding the perfect finish on an
elevator
can make a lousy day disappear in a hurry...
----------------------------------
Subject: Maintenance cost
Q326: How do my maintenance costs compare to a certified airplane?
A: Probably lower for the homebuilt, but it's not an absolute
guarantee. Parts prices will be far less, and if you're the
original builder, labor cost is zero. But if your engine
installation or wiring has problems, expensive parts can
break in
a hurry.
Take care of it, and it should take care of you.
----------------------------------
Subject: Experimental Aircraft Association
Q327: Who is the EAA, and what do they offer me?
How can I join, and are there any local builder clubs?
A: The Experimental Aircraft Association was formed in the '50s for
the purpose of sharing information amongst homebuilders.
Originally
regional in scope, the EAA rapidly grew in later years. EAA
headquarters in Oshkosh WI is the sponsor and site of the
annual
aviation party now known worldwide simply as
"Oshkosh".
EAAs political involvement is somewhat different from the
AOPA. The
AOPA was formed in support of all types of pilots, and
tends to be
more of a pilot aid and lobbying organization, while the
EAA
focuses more on building and flying for sport. This is not
to say
that they don't take a political stance for their
membership,
however. They have been active in the area of
simplified
certification requirements for new training aircraft, and
they had
a part in the creation of auto-fuel STC's for certified
light
aircraft. Frankly, if you're a pilot, both organizations
deserve
your support.
The foundation of EAA's membership support is through the
organization of hundreds of local "chapters"
where members get
together on a routine basis.
Some chapters have club-wide projects, some stress
education, and
some are only social in function. Most have at least one
"Technical
Counselor" that can help you with your project, or
provide
inspections. Involvement with a chapter is not a bad idea
if you're
just getting started.
I can't stress the function of the Tech Counselor enough.
If
you're about to begin a project, you will need someone to
check
out your work and sign the construction log to effect. The
sooner you get to know these people, the better off you'll
be.
The membership office is at (800)322-2412. The general
office
number is (414)426-4800. If you join, they will provide
local
chapter info upon request. Their address is:
EAA Aviation Center
P.O. Box 3086
Oshkosh, WI 54903-3086
http://www.eaa.org/
----------------------------------
Subject: Parts and Supplies
Q328: Where can I find parts or materials for my project?
A. Grab any homebuilder's magazine and scan the advertisements.
There are pleny of outfits just itching to set you up.
----------------------------------
Subject: Books
Q329: Can I find more written info?
A: First, join the EAA. Among other benefits, they have an
extensive catalog of books covering homebuilding.
Anything
writen by Tony Bingelis is a good start.
Available from the FAA (call your local FSDO) and
suggested:
AC 20-27D - Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built
Aircraft.
AC 90-89 - Amateur-Built aircraft Flight Testing
Handbook.
----------------------------------
Subject: Computer Info
Q330: Are there any BBS'es where I can get more info?
A: The FAA runs the "Experimental Safety BBS" in Oke City.
Access is
free, and usage is anonymous if desired. The service is
provided
to the homebuilt community as an effort to help disseminate
information about potential safety problems with
experimental
aircraft. A list of "51% Approved" kits is
online, and a list of
most AD's on certified engines and accessories commonly
used in
homebuilts is also available.
The number is (800)426-3814 @ 2400-N-8-1, after working
hours.
The password is "safety". (Sorry, there is no
Internet access).
----------------------------------
Subject: Other builders
Q331: Is there anyone on Usenet who knows about the GarageRocket 432?
A: There is a "builders list" regularly reposted to
rec.aviation.homebuilt. Most, if not all, will be
quite
willing to talk about their project.
----------------------------------
Subject: Finding Assistance:
Q332: I'm having trouble with construction, where can I get help?
A: If you're having trouble with plans or type-specific details:
The first place to check is with the kit or plans supplier.
They
may be able to assist over the phone, or direct you to
someone in
your area who has been through this before. This also
allows the
supplier to know where the weak spots in their
documentation are
so that it can be fixed later.
The local EAA chapter may know of other builders of your
type
nearby, or there may even be a type club in the area. Check
with
these groups also, they'll be glad to assist.
If you're stuck on construction technique (welding,
painting, etc):
Again, check with the local EAA chapter for someone who has
some
experience with the technique causing you trouble. All of
us end up
learning a few skills in the course of construction, so
don't be
afraid to ask for help when it's needed. Remember, you'll
be
trusting your life to the airplane, so learn to do it
right.
Certain skills will require practice, so please don't run
right out
and try things on a new airframe first. If you're learning
to weld
for instance, sacrifice some tubing and practice on it
until the
quality of your workmanship becomes acceptable. It will be
cheaper
and easier in the long run. Save the samples also, the
inspector
will feel better looking at a "destructible"
sample.
----------------------------------
Subject: Homebuilt Aircraft Financing
Q333: How can I finance my kit purchase?
A: The best way is to select a kit that either builds from scratch
or is available as subkits. Financing increases your cost
quite
a bit.
Netters have identified two companies which have financing
available for homebuilders. Here are some of their terms,
as supplied
in October, 1995:
NAFCO/EAA Finance Plan
(800) 999-3712
$10,000 minimum loan, no maximum. They'll fund 70% of the
total cost
for up to five years, then will extend the loan until aircraft
completion. Loan rate is based on the prime rate and the
amount
borrowed: 3% over prime for $10,000-$15,000, 2.5% over
prime for $15K
to $25K, 2% over prime for loans $25K to $50K, and prime +1.5%
for
over $50,000.
Green Tree Financial Corporation
(800) 851-1367 extension 3692
$5,000 minimum, no maximum. Finance 90% of the total cost
for up to 15
years. Interest rate for less than $25,000 is currently
13%, $25K< is
11%.
Other options include: Borrow from 401K finance plan (~8%
interest),
signature loan from credit union (the current rate at my CU is
11.75%), or home equity loan (~8.5%).
----------------------------------------------
Q334: Can I take lessons/get my license in my homebuilt?
A. Like so many things in aviation, the answer is, "Yes, but..."
There is no regulations to prevent your taking lessons or your flight test in a homebuilt
aircraft. Your ability to do so will depend on finding an instructor willing to
instruct in a homebuilt, as well as an Examiner willing to administer the test in the
aircraft. Neither is automatic, and you'll have little recourse if they refuse. If
you would like to take lessons in your homebuilt, ask around at your local EAA chapter.
Many EAA members are instructors, and would probably be more willing. My
local chapters, for instance,
include several CFIs who administer BFRs in members' homebuilts.